![]() insult to the counterparty, that paints a picture of a signing that is a pretense-to-insult and not a proper meeting of the minds (which could be rebutted by purple's genuine business needs, e.g. If they used purple because it is a racial, cultural, religious etc. Those would indicate a deal that should be enforced, or voided with compensation because anti-purple is acting in bad faith.Ĭonversely purple-signer must have no ulterior motive. ![]() Now that they've met you, they realize they must build a $6000 wheelchair ramp.They ran your credit 5 minutes after you signed and found it to be 340, (and that should have been part of pre-signing due diligence and it's too late now).It's medical insurance and you just got diagnosed with a million dollar disease.They must continuously look, walk and quack like someone who did not accept your signature.įurther, the galaxy of facts must make it apparent that they (and you) have no ulterior motive, especially not an unlawful one. Absolute refusal to fulfill the contract, mailing you copies of the contract and asking you to sign them, doing that and including a nice black pen, a certified letter that the contract is not valid, stuff like that. Their only hope would be, starting at the moment of signing, to act like the signature is invalid. If both parties acted like they wanted a deal, and then acted to perform the contract in the normal matter, then they accepted the signature, period. both parties' conduct after the signing (are they fulfilling their part of the contract?).Both parties' conduct before the signing (do they act like people wanting to make a deal?).It is about the galaxy of facts particular to this case. Which makes it impossible to give a generic answer. ![]() If parties' willingness to work with each other falls apart over the color of signature ink, that clouds the "meeting of minds", especially since I'll be excluding every other cause, read on.īut conduct is everything, which means context is everything. ![]() Anti-purple is saying the contract is not signed, so is invalid. A contract-breaking dispute has arisen over the color of ink on the contract. My best advice: purple ink is fine, unless they object, then find a color you both agree to.Įverything past this point assumes an adverse relationship. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |